Roe vs. Wade for Men


Today I was asked if I wished to participate in a bbc radio discussion OPPOSING Mel Feit, the founder of the National Center for Men on the Roe vs Wade case attempting to get some ‘abortion’ rights for men.

Hello

I work as a producer for a BBC World Service radio programme World Have Your Say in London.

Tonight we are talking about this case dubbed Roe vs Wade for Men.

Mel Feit, founder of National Center for Men, is coming on our programme to argue their case and we're looking for contributors, particularly those who would take the opposing to balance up the debate.

Do you have any particular views on this case and would you be available to talk to us at 1pm Eastern time in America (6pm UK time)?

If so, please contact me as soon as you can with a contact phone number and we'll give you a call.

Yours sincerely

Yannick Guerry, World Have Your Say

If you want to listen to the show you can access the site by going to www.bbc.co.uk/news/worldhaveyoursay

I turned them down because quite frankly, I agree 100% with the basic premise behind this case.

Anybody who thinks I would be on the opposite side of this case, obviously hasn’t been paying attention.

I mean over and above recognizing that just because a man managed to get into your pants doesn’t mean he signed on to become a father; why in the world would a MOTHER even WANT a man to have rights to her child before she even knows if he’s interested in said child?

WHY?

We are in a world where casual and recreational sex rules. Where a sixteen year old has sex with two different men one day and then is tortured and raped by them the next. Every guy who has sex with you is NOT your friend or interested in a long-term relationship with you, which is what you are talking about when you demand that a recreational sperm donor pay child support. As that entitles a recreational sperm donor to legal rights equivalent to your own vis-à-vis your child.

What are women as mothers thinking?

The ONLY persons I would want around my baby are those who feel like I do, which is that my child is the most significant and best thing EVER since sliced bread came about…

Not somebody who is hanging around waiting for the opportunity to wrestle custody from me in order to pay less child support…

Remember one thing…the people pushing this issue are not men so much (since they are not happy to be paying these high child support amounts that public policy has been crippling them with over the last decade or so). This is a mistake people frequently make. These men are the tools (or fools as some would call them since after observing them for a while now, I can confidently say that many of these MRAs are not very bright…) but are tools being used by the brains behind this operation.

As the real manipulator behind the scenes are these gender-neutralized feminists. They are the MAIN instigators of this situation mothers and children are facing.

These feminists are doing this for reasons of ideology, not finance, although they cover it well, frequently pretending to be concerned about the public’s purse. To be honest, I never saw a program a gender-neutralized feminist objected to because it was too expensive, as long as the gist of the program involved separating mothers from their children, they have been supportive of it everytime. From daycare to gender-neutral custody, even having single mothers on the front lines in times of war, these gender-neutralized feminists have jumped on every single one of these programs and made them their own.

As feminists ultimate goal is the total destruction of the mother/child bond and having a completely gender-neutral society.

That is their goal: where 50% of women are in prison for various crimes (even though men commit about 90% of every deviant act in our society); where 50% of the armed forces consists of women (even though studies have shown that the best women EVEN with special forces training CANNOT beat the average man in combat); where 50% of mothers OR MORE have lost custody of their children (and if these gender-neutralized feminists have to drag recreational sperm donors, with no interest in children whatsoever, into the mix to achieve this goal, they are perfectly willing to sacrifice our children on the altar of gender neutrality to do it).

For instance…

Let’s watch the news tonight and see who is the most enraged that this Debra Lafave idiot didn’t go to jail. It will be interesting to see how many feminists are more upset about THIS then men are. Here feminists NEVER said a word when that Judge Cashman sentenced a man to probation, after he admitted raping a little girl since the kid was 4 until she was 10 years old. Nor did they speak out about another judge, Judge Connor, when he released another man who plead guilty to raping two boys, 5 and 11 years old…Actually to be honest the ONLY one really upset about this was Bill O’Reilly, not one feminist newscaster…I didn’t hear one as upset about this as he was.

YET they will ALL have their panties in a bunch about this teacher getting three years house arrest and then six years probation for sex with a teenager…

These are the things these idiots focus on…

Why.

Because their goal is an androgynous society where everyone is marching to the same inner drummer like a mindless pod person. Where a teenage boy acts exactly like a teenage girl and men and women are as matched as two peas in a pod. Where women care as much about sex and sports as men do and men are just as committed to ‘mothering’ as a mother is…

Thus Debra Lafave is labeled a ‘predator’ equivalent to Joseph Smith (who raped and murdered an 11 year old in Florida), Joseph Duncan (who murdered three people to kidnap, rape and murder 2 children, one was rescued through the grace of God as she would have been dead as well if it was up to Duncan) John Couey (who raped and murdered a 9 year old in Florida) and so it goes on endlessly to the androgynous drumbeat tapped out by gender-neutralized feminists.

Lafave will NOW be taking up valuable space on the sexual crimes registry as well…where thousands of irrelevant criminals like her are making that registry useless, as it’s slowly being overwhelmed with data. It has now become impossible to have a decent sex predator registry where people like Duncan, Smith and Couey SHOULD be it’s sole occupants. Why? Again, because these androgynous idiots are turning these data bases into dump sites where every idiot who has sex with a teenager is now considered a ‘predator’…

We can’t even have a decent Amber alert system going in this country. Again why? Because the same men who are attempting to get this Roe vs. Wade ruling passed are also the ones who are spending all of their time instigating parental abductions to cut their child support. So what are MOST of these Amber Alerts but parental abductions instigated by custody fights.

You could NEVER get a Joseph Duncan with an Amber Alert because everybody is using them as another tool in Round 42 of a custody fight…so who in the heck has the time to look for a real sexual predator???

Answer: no one…

So of course, I would support this Roe vs. Wade case. Thank GOD if it would become the law of the land…Heck we would probably cut out about 50% of the FBI caseload with these parental abductions alone, I can tell you that much if this guy wins his case.

But, let’s sit back and see who will be fighting tooth and nail against that case becoming law…that’s right, it will be your friendly, neighborhood, gender-neutralized feminist.

Mark my word on that…