tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post3106048642322935180..comments2023-07-28T07:44:40.802-04:00Comments on Women as Mothers: Important Distinction Made Between Father and Sperm DonorsNYMOMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-19338031953070658692008-03-20T19:35:00.000-04:002008-03-20T19:35:00.000-04:00Again, waiting months to comment on an article put...Again, waiting months to comment on an article puts the burden on me to have to look it up to address your questions.<BR/><BR/>Sorry, but you can look it up yourself...and sperm donation has been around for decades now, it's not a new technology. The groups using it might have shifted, as it used to be couples where the husband was infertile. Now it's single women mostly, both gay and straight who are using it. <BR/><BR/>That's all that's changed. <BR/><BR/>So there were plenty of 18 years old and older folks around who demonstrated NO INTEREST whatsoever in contacting their sperm donor. NONE.<BR/><BR/>What the article was trying to do was compare mothers who gave up children for adoption and sperm donors and there's just no comparison...It was the usual jealous misfits like yourself trying to compare your poisition with a mother's and even the kids you spawned weren't buying it.NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-78603637165059338052008-03-18T17:07:00.000-04:002008-03-18T17:07:00.000-04:00Ice cream and crimeAs a woman trying to downplay t...<B>Ice cream and crime</B><BR/><BR/>As a woman trying to downplay the correlation between single mother homes and criminal offspring put it, statistics may not always be as they seem (except when they are.)<BR/><BR/>In this case, NYMOM claims (unsupported/uncited) that none of the children of sperm donors in NZ have yet to make an inquiry. Well, duh. It takes at least 18 years after the law is passed for it to take effect. Children born a few years ago wouldn't benefit since the law wouldn't apply to them due to confidentiality agreements with the previous donor still being legally in effect.<BR/><BR/>It's interesting that you ask "who cares about some jerkoff who sprouted off in a dixie cup 18 years ago." Well, apparently the mother did since she PAID for his sperm and BORE a child of his! These aren't just "jerkoffs". They're good looking and often well educated jerkoffs who didn't want to have a child with these women. She's paying him and you have to respect that.<BR/><BR/>Yes, the women gestate the children for 9 months when they "choose to" and adopt them out but they also often "choose to" smoke crack cocaine, cigarettes, and booze during that time too. Oh, other than when they get an abortion. <BR/><BR/>I wonder if that has something to do with disabled children. Nah. Just a correlation made up by us dishonest MRA's...PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-41420201631610965282008-01-20T14:46:00.000-05:002008-01-20T14:46:00.000-05:00Exactly...the only reliable way to ensure you are ...Exactly...the only reliable way to ensure you are not on the hook for child support would be an anonymous sperm donation but even that is coming under attack now, claiming it's bad for children not to do who their anonymous donor is. <BR/><BR/>Like a kid really cares about that????<BR/><BR/>It's men who are concerned about that, not kids. Kids could probably care less. Actually they instituted some program in New Zealand or something where kids, when they reach 18 years old, could find out who who their anonymous donors were and not even ONE KID signed up for it. NOT ONE...which goes to show what I've been saying right along. They could care less.<BR/><BR/>Who cares about some jerkoff who sprouted off in a dixie cup 18 years ago. Probably got $50.00 or less for it...and could have spawned dozens of kids before they changed the law limiting how many times they could contribute.<BR/><BR/>It's ridiculous to try to compare these idiots with mothers who chose to carry a baby to term and then give up their children for adoption...one is trying to give her child a better life, the other is trying to make a quick and dirty $50. <BR/><BR/>Many studies, at least in the past, showed younger, single women who gave their children up for adoption to be more stable and higher educated then those who kept the child.<BR/><BR/>But maybe that has changed too, who knows.<BR/><BR/>But yeah the guy was a moron.NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-70507216690423812172008-01-07T18:02:00.000-05:002008-01-07T18:02:00.000-05:00My head is spinning -- what part of "former girlfr...My head is spinning -- what part of "former girlfriend" makes this difficult to understand??!!??<BR/>Perhaps she assured him he would not be "liable" until the cold hard reality of single motherhood (X2) took hold...<BR/>Still, what a jerk!Valhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03152215204773184788noreply@blogger.com