tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post1818286106083837476..comments2023-07-28T07:44:40.802-04:00Comments on Women as Mothers: Finally-- Justice has It's Day in CourtNYMOMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-68471356266108896542009-12-28T08:28:20.144-05:002009-12-28T08:28:20.144-05:00The problem with waiting for so-called karma to ad...The problem with waiting for so-called karma to address these issues is that many of these creeps have a long and happy life and then karma kicks in when they are 60ish or so...I don't consider it justice when the last 10 or so years of their life they are unhappy while they damaged countless other people along the long long path waiting for some sort of justice to catch up with them...<br /><br />It's like that show Cold Cases. What's the point of solving a 30 year old case??? There's no justice even if you catch the perpetrator. He's already beat the system so to speak.NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-11681468613652615072009-12-19T15:58:49.679-05:002009-12-19T15:58:49.679-05:00This is nothing new for Pat Smith. He is now in th...This is nothing new for Pat Smith. He is now in the middle of a divorce with his current wife, Susan. Reasons being because he is unfaithful and has had numerous affairs with his wife, including a close friend of hers who he is NOW living with in their family home while his wife has moved out. If justice doesn't prevail, then karma certainly will for Patrick Smith.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-15156409559477057682008-02-11T19:46:00.000-05:002008-02-11T19:46:00.000-05:00I think you have the Marks situation a little conf...I think you have the Marks situation a little confused. <BR/><BR/>It was John Aylsworth who was 'using' the judicial system. Bridget Marks was unemployed, it's rare that an unemployed person with two kids is going to start a custody battle that could cost her upwards of $50,000. That's a pretty common dollar amount for a contested custody fight in New York City...<BR/><BR/>The false charges, if they were false, we'll never know the truth, well they came out when Marks saw she was in danger of losing her children, which is not unusual. Many women enter the courts unaware of the changes that have taken place over the years in family law. They assume that only unfit mothers lose their children. Some grow desperate and this is the result. <BR/><BR/>Like I said, it's the reaction of the weak against the strong...<BR/><BR/>Of course I wish women wouldn't do this sort of thing making false accusations. Probably if they were more aggressive like men, for instance, they would just murder the other party. So I guess we'll know gender neutral feminism has succeeded once women begin reacting more like men and just kill the other party instead of making a false accusation against them. <BR/><BR/>Okay.<BR/><BR/>Happy now.NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-6022058817669792072008-02-11T16:55:00.000-05:002008-02-11T16:55:00.000-05:00If you want to see it as making a stronger case, t...If you want to see it as making a stronger case, then that is fine with me. You can also choose to say that she holds no liability herself, but I believe your need to be the one in the "right" keeps your eyes from seeing the truth. Passing on to our children a legacy of "victim" only perpetuates societal dysfunction and using our judicial system to seek personal revenge or liability is not what it is there for.~ Linda Bluehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15083735836040141333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-20651348156354802382008-02-10T10:47:00.000-05:002008-02-10T10:47:00.000-05:00Actually you just made a stronger case for a husba...Actually you just made a stronger case for a husband or wife that cheats to be held liable, since the damage can be years in the making before it finally impacts someone's life. <BR/><BR/>BTW, they have ways of identifying strains of HIV, herpes, etc., so they can pretty much pinpoint who passed it along to you. They simply compare the strains through blood samples. They have convicted a number of people (both men and women) of passing AIDs by using these markers. <BR/><BR/>So don't act like this woman could have had it for a decade or more and suddenly it flared up and she just blamed her ex. These diseases have markers and are identifiable.<BR/><BR/>This case might have been overturned but there are hundreds more waiting in the wings and people are already in jail for knowingly passing AIDS. It might eventually be considered a lesser crime to do through cheating, more negligence then intent. But it will someday be looked upon as exactly what it is in this day and age: risking your partner's health through negligent behavior. Even the Gay community is exploring having laws passed where you are liable for the medical bills of a partner if you infect them with an STD.NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-76271565948972146242008-02-05T09:08:00.000-05:002008-02-05T09:08:00.000-05:00My feelings about what Janet Smith did here are ve...My feelings about what Janet Smith did here are very sad. Trying to shame someone for a wrong doing, has no happy ending for the one who was wronged to begin with. She wanted to take from Patrick Neiland Smith his good name and an unlimited amount of compensation for what he had stolen from her through betrayal. This is to no avail.<BR/><BR/>I think it is very sad that some women believe leaving this type of legacy to our children is actually the right thing to do. I do not want my children to live in an America that uses the government to control their life, including their moral and ethical decisions, by making them a criminal offense. Nor do I want them to use the judicial system to seek revenge for a heartache unjustly caused. <BR/><BR/>Irrespective of gender, it is very dangerous to use the judicial system of a Free country to control its citizen's level of morals and values. At that point you are risking the deterioration of a government for the people, by the people, & of the people; in lieu, leaving the system vulnerable to exploitation and excessive controls. <BR/><BR/>In that vein: Kudos to the Superior Court Jurors for the verdict. (NO LIABILITY FOUND IN STD CASE by Leslie Parrilla Published on 2006-11-25, Page B1, Tribune, The (San Luis Obispo, CA)).<BR/><BR/>I believe that information about this particular STD needs more exposure. HPV causing Cervical Cancer is much like HIV causing full-blown AIDS in the sense that it can lie dormant for years before manifesting itself as a fatal disease.<BR/><BR/>Here is some information found on www.healthywomen.org <BR/><BR/>"How is HPV spread?<BR/><BR/>HPV is spread by skin-to-skin contact with an HPV-infected area. Infections can be subclinical, meaning the virus lives in the skin without causing symptoms. This is why many people with HPV do not know they have it or that they could spread it. It can take weeks, months or years for genital warts to surface after sexual relations with an infected person.<BR/><BR/>Researchers already know that condoms don't always protect against the virus because warts can grow on areas of the genitals not covered by a latex barrier. A study in Great Britain, for example, found evidence that HPV may be transmitted from one's hands to a partner's genitals. Consequently, some lawmakers are pushing for better labeling of condoms so the public knows that no barrier contraceptive method can completely safeguard against the virus.<BR/><BR/>Researchers don't know whether people infected with genital HPV but who don't have symptoms are as contagious as people with symptoms. They also don't know how much HPV is transmitted through sexual contact versus skin-to-skin contact." <BR/><BR/>I am one more of the many single parents out there, just not so bitter as most. I celebrate my life as a woman! ~ Linda Blue~ Linda Bluehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15083735836040141333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-75164298858759126282007-10-31T01:33:00.000-04:002007-10-31T01:33:00.000-04:00Yes, you're right.BOTH should be held liable. But...Yes, you're right.<BR/><BR/>BOTH should be held liable. But the complications for that would be so unbelievable that realistically we have to be satisfied if we get just one...NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-32677590189987346832007-10-21T14:56:00.000-04:002007-10-21T14:56:00.000-04:00I couldn't agree more! It is high time for this to...I couldn't agree more! It is high time for this to happen. I have been contemplating a civil suit against not only my fiance', but his mistress as well. I was lucky and did not contract an STD. However I had to pay for testing, suffer unbelievable humilation going to my family doctor. I don't think it is just the man, but the mistress that should be responsible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-41292213409931522402006-11-24T11:21:00.000-05:002006-11-24T11:21:00.000-05:00This has NOTHING to do with the article I posted, ...This has NOTHING to do with the article I posted, nothing.<br /><br />This article is about a man who cheated and then brought a disease home to his wife which resulted in her needing a hysterectomy...<br /><br />If she was younger and didn't have any children yet, he might have ensured that she would never have any, even if she remarried. <br /><br />Just like that Lee Marvin did to his live-in girlfriend pressuring her into all those abortions and then dumping her when she was too old to have any hope of a marriage and children with someone else...<br /><br />Typical selfish behavior from men which you have gotten away with in the past as you fixed the whole court system to benefit yourselves...well this case will put a little crimp in your style finally...<br /><br />Not permanently; however, as I'm sure you all will be figuring a way to manipulate the system before the ink is even dry on the judgment...NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-63976807162510977752006-11-22T17:15:00.000-05:002006-11-22T17:15:00.000-05:00They all say that men's biological connection to c...They all say that men's biological connection to children is unimportant, your kids or someone else's, it doesn't matter. What's important they say is that a man should take on the responsibility of "social" father and slave and pay for any slut's kids. Biological paternity, they say, is of no consequence whatsoever to a man and is a load of crock. They say, shut up, get to work slave, pay for the whore's kids, and don't complain - but if you do, then the CSA will come and get you and shove you in jail.<br /><br />That's their ethics.<br /><br />How long are you men going to put up with this rubbish?<br /><br />What are you? Men, slaves or just gutless idiots?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com