tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post3189848823076586264..comments2023-07-28T07:44:40.802-04:00Comments on Women as Mothers: Example of Quick Strike "Temporary Custody" Strategy that Men are Advised to Use...NYMOMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comBlogger62125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-23979779785979385842009-10-08T20:07:41.076-04:002009-10-08T20:07:41.076-04:00NYMOM, as I sit here reading your comments, I'...NYMOM, as I sit here reading your comments, I'm listening to a report coming out of Illinois about an entire family that was just murdered, and the number one suspect is a former son-in-law who was married to one of the daughters! But hey, it's ALWAYS the wife who is to blame. God!viragonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-61520242484580277942009-10-07T13:50:19.411-04:002009-10-07T13:50:19.411-04:00I will say one thing to Glenn Sacks's challeng...I will say one thing to Glenn Sacks's challenge: Darren Mack.<br /><br />I rest my case...<br /><br />Polish Knight: didn't we already put that lie to rest that women have kids just to get benefits? Or weren't you paying attention again???<br /><br />Didn't I just post a study that showed in states with higher collection rates for child support the birth rates dropped by 20% for single moms (your definition of 'welfare queens').<br /><br />Wake up already!!! I feel like in every other post I'm covering the same ground with you that was just covered...how old are you anyway????NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-29166806490374362992009-09-30T21:00:09.534-04:002009-09-30T21:00:09.534-04:00"Richard, Glenn Sacks recently posed a challe..."Richard, Glenn Sacks recently posed a challenge to feminists to actually show a SINGLE CASE where a mother lost her child to a documented abusive father due to claims of Parental Alienation Syndrome and the children were later found harmed by him."<br /><br />That's a crock! <br /><br />http://americanchildrenunderground.blogspot.com/2009/09/domestic-violence-by-proxy-clarity-on.html<br /><br />These kids are now adults, and they have clear memories of what their father did to them after he won custody by using PAS. But, I suppose their lying now, huh?viragonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-21794813124167227462009-07-09T13:40:43.005-04:002009-07-09T13:40:43.005-04:00NYMOM, as I said, I don't understand precisely...NYMOM, as I said, I don't understand precisely by what you mean by the term "recreational sperm donor". If you mean an anonymous guy the mother never sees again, he doesn't "pay" anything. But if he's not anonymous, and is expected to pay "child" support, then he's paying far more than she did. <br /><br />I had a girlfriend that used to be a property manager for section 8 housing and she told me it was common for the welfare queens to have more children at specific times to get around the work requirements (if they have a child under 6, they get to stay on longer.) They also referred to the first Monday of the month as "Mothers' Day" because that's when the welfare checks arrived. <br /><br />The pain of giving birth in leau of earning a living is a pretty sweet deal. In addition, this is something to remember: It's HER CHOICE!!! Just like tennis elbow. "Get it?"PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-78139881596195604542009-07-09T13:33:18.659-04:002009-07-09T13:33:18.659-04:00Richard, it's funny the way many people are sl...Richard, it's funny the way many people are slaves to their hormones. Yes, men are often fools for sleeping around without a condom or throwing money at women to try to impress them into the sack. (The latter is happening less and less as women now are often throwing themselves at men to get "free" sperm. See this cute article: http://tinyurl.com/nbygmo )<br /><br />"Getting men to co-operate — even if traditional methods are employed — is not always straightforward, of course. One woman, who did not want to be named, said she found that 21st century metro-man is now frustratingly aware of “shared responsibility” when it comes to sexual encounters, and her attempts at impregnation became farcical as she attempted to find a man who would mate au naturel."<br /><br />Another recent trend has been for increasingly lonely young career women to buy homes to meet their nesting urge ("everything old is new again!..." http://tinyurl.com/mm5hu <br /><br />"For those buyers who had dreamed of quick riches, the change in the market has come as a sobering lesson. A little over a year ago, Shabana Qureshi, a 26-year-old engineer, put deposits down on two condos in Arlington. "My friends were making hundreds of thousands of dollars off of properties," Ms. Qureshi said. "I just thought I'll take this risk now and not think about it too much, and once the time comes I can either sell it or use it depending on my needs."<br /><br />She moved into a one-bedroom condo at Clarendon 1021 with hardwood floors, granite kitchen countertops and a heated pool on the roof. But having taken a pay cut with a new job, she can no longer afford the mortgage and maintenance fees, which are almost $3,000 a month."<br /><br />In the bad old days, divorce was rare, most middle class women had a home in the suburbs, and a diamond ring on their finger and free meals on dates (not just hook ups for DVD's). The last hope is to get Obama to spend a few billion on freebies for unwed mothers. Yeah, just as soon as he gives it all to the rich white male bankers. Tee hee!PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-61991642062835409772009-07-09T13:22:33.386-04:002009-07-09T13:22:33.386-04:00My point Polish Knight was not whether or not wome...My point Polish Knight was not whether or not women voluntarily chose to have children but that a man being a recreational sperm donor is totally different from a woman deciding to have a baby (even if you make the case she made an irresponsible decision)...she is STILL going to pay the price that a recreational sperm donor will not...so there is no equivalency between these two groups.<br /><br />GET IT...<br /><br />AND Richard, I started the blog in 2004 but I was involved with the issue and communicating with mothers who had lost their children long before then...I had a few other options besides this blog, but decided on the blog for a number of reasons...<br /><br />Anyway my point is that this blog was the end of a long process, not the first step as you imply...I thought a lot about it and discussed it with others before I decided to start a blog versus other options...<br /><br />It might not be much but it's a LOT more then mothers had before I started it. <br /><br />I noticed I'm even listed in that Wikipedia and I've had people contact me to appear on their radio shows, nothing on tv but radio or print media have asked if I wanted to interview...<br /><br />So far I've turned them down but who knows about the future...NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-21878001140625160742009-07-09T12:49:41.942-04:002009-07-09T12:49:41.942-04:00Yeah, the stats are from 2000 but they're as u...Yeah, the stats are from 2000 but they're as up-to-date as anything else we have until they collect the new data next year.<br /><br />And those stats were a lot more current when you started this blog in what, 2004? Beating the drum even then about some phony epidemic of mothers everywhere "losing" custody when the official data showed no such thing.<br /><br />"BTW, ONLY a man could compare recreational sperm donation with something he calls "recreational' babymaking since there is no such thing..."<br /><br />Not me. I call it stupid babymaking.<br /><br />RichardAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-12718886484650222632009-07-09T12:34:31.337-04:002009-07-09T12:34:31.337-04:00NYMOM, I didn't say people in Africa were shoc...NYMOM, I didn't say people in Africa were shocked. I said people "there", where my wife is from, are shocked. She is from Eastern Europe. I realize I didn't make this absolutely clear, but I didn't mention Africa anywhere in that comment while I talked about my wife. <br /><br />Regarding your dramatics about the pain and "bloody mess" of childbirth, we've already called that bluff. If women don't want kids, then they needn't pay for fertility clinics, sperm banks, and they have options such as tubal litigation and various methods of birth control in addition to abortion and adoption. I love this notion you're trying to perpetuate that women's childbirth pains should be treated similar to a national sacrifice and funded by the taxpayer like we pay for ICBM's but, on the other hand, it's HER BODY and HER CHOICE and the taxpayer shouldn't have a say. If this is so essential to national security and survival, all women should have their mating choices dictated by the government like men who register for selective service. Kapish?<br /><br />Most women in the west have babies because they want to. Period. I feel sorry for the pain of these women about as much as someone who gets tennis elbow. If a woman doesn't want to have children, that's her personal choice and the world goes on. Deal with it.<br /><br />Finally, your claim that there are feminists and progressives giving custody to men all over the place as a fad is total conjecture. Richard at least came up with statistics even if they may be a bit old. From anecdotes of people I know, women who have lost custody were usually so negligent that even the courts couldn't ignore it or the couples got shared custody but, gasp, she lost her "child" support and, gasp, had to get a JOB. EEEK! That's what this is all about: You accusing men of being "greedy" and wanting to keep their child-support even as you praise women who exploiting their children as chattel like a farmer who raises sheep.PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-59035341303210582342009-07-09T11:49:46.704-04:002009-07-09T11:49:46.704-04:00BTW, ONLY a man could compare recreational sperm d...BTW, ONLY a man could compare recreational sperm donation with something he calls "recreational' babymaking since there is no such thing...every mother goes through the same bloody painful mess whatever her reason for having a child...<br /><br />It's the great equalizer amongst women...NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-38010076955746351722009-07-09T11:42:34.563-04:002009-07-09T11:42:34.563-04:00Wow...I really believe you now Polish Knight espec...Wow...I really believe you now Polish Knight especially since you pointed out to me that people in Africa are sooooo shocked at the numbers of abandoned babies we have her in the US...<br /><br />You're really credible with that comment...NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-62307071198645944802009-07-09T11:40:42.551-04:002009-07-09T11:40:42.551-04:00Yes, Richard you did point it out in an earlier th...Yes, Richard you did point it out in an earlier thread which was ALMOST TWO YEARS AGO...<br /><br />PLUS that 85/15 number men have been using for propoganda purposes for the last TEN YEARS or so now trying to act like they are being discriminated against in family courts when it's actually just the opposite...people (especially gender neutral feminists which have overrun our legal system) bend over backwards to give men custody. It's considered progressive and trendy for this to happen today...<br /><br />So knock it off with the phoney talking points.NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-24398304895297217202009-07-08T17:25:34.009-04:002009-07-08T17:25:34.009-04:00NY, the 85/15 breakdown isn't old and it's...NY, the 85/15 breakdown isn't old and it's composed of parents only. GP's don't enter into the equation.<br /><br />If those 85% of single mothers didn't actually have their kids the greater part of the time they wouldn't be counted as custodial. Government statistics don't deal in "custody" in a legal sense (like fem stats do) but in who has the kids the greater part of the time.<br /><br />And I think I pointed out in an earlier thread that there are between 4 and 5 million grandparent-headed households, not custodial grandparents. Most (about three quarters) of those grandparent-headed households contain custodial parents.<br /><br />Six years ago my parents would have been included in that 5-4 million. Because my sister, her husband, and their child lived in their household at the time.<br /><br />Still a paper tiger. Talk about using a worst case scenario to prove a point...<br /><br />RichardAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-64751000018876646792009-07-08T13:43:32.653-04:002009-07-08T13:43:32.653-04:00Richard/NYMOM, I like the term "recreational ...Richard/NYMOM, I like the term "recreational sperm donors" to put down men (presumably men who have casual unprotected sex, but I wonder if NYMOM is applying this to all men)<br /><br />Yet, what about recreational baby makers? Women who squeeze out babies into poverty as a lifestyle? Hey, I'll be the first to say that recreational sperm donors are acting recklessly but they're just enjoying sex. On the other hand, what kind of person enjoys making unsupported babies for fun?<br /><br />My wife whose new to this whole concept of welfare was shocked. "Why would someone have a baby if they couldn't afford it?" she wondered. She was shocked at the large families she sees because people who are budgeting have smaller ones there. I told her that in our affluent suburban neighborhood (where we can afford to live because of me), people are able to afford to responsibly do this. But she couldn't imagine having a child in squalor as a career choice. "Why not go to school and first get settled or find a decent man?" she asked. How naive she is...<br /><br />In addition, it shocks people over there that so many babies are found in trash dumpsters here. When someone like that happens over there, it reaches national news and the police engage in a man,er, womanhunt. Here, it's not big deal. <br /><br />Yeah, it's men's fault that women as mothers here are getting a bad reputation...PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-48021839755085598782009-07-08T13:32:55.911-04:002009-07-08T13:32:55.911-04:00NYMOM, women being the ones who bear children does...NYMOM, women being the ones who bear children doesn't change the fact that they can LEGALLY abandon children. You want to deny that women have this right because so few of them exercise it even as you take the freak cases of men's violence to catigate all men.<br /><br />Yet even with welfare, legal infant abandonment, "child" support, reverse discrimination, the little ladies still can't help but put more and more children into poverty, have children with bad boys, and toss babies into trash dumpsters.<br /><br />And yes, there are breadwinning men in Africa. We just don't see them on late night TV with starving kids because when the children in their custody, they don't need it. Thanks for pointing that out.PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-36543885448811164732009-07-08T13:27:01.077-04:002009-07-08T13:27:01.077-04:00Richard, Glenn Sacks recently posed a challenge to...Richard, Glenn Sacks recently posed a challenge to feminists to actually show a SINGLE CASE where a mother lost her child to a documented abusive father due to claims of Parental Alienation Syndrome and the children were later found harmed by him.<br /><br />They couldn't come up with a SINGLE ONE.<br /><br />On the other hand, there are numerous cases of mommy dearests making allegations of abuse against the father and later winding up abusing the child themselves. Such as this case:<br /><br />http://www.glennsacks.com/blog/?p=781<br />"Domestic Violence is a destroyer. It is believed that Gilberta Estrada hanged herself-after hanging her four young daughters first. A police investigation hopes to confirm the tragic facts of this case. An already confirmed fact is that Estrada was a victim of domestic violence. The Associated Press reports that she had previously obtained a restraining order against the father of one or more of her children. Can we rule out the possibility that domestic violence, or the threat of continued domestic violence, was a contributing factor to the depression Estrada was reported to be experiencing and the decision to end her life and the lives of her children?"<br /><br />(Note: The above father was only ACCUSED of abuse and a restraining order taken out against him by a mother who murdered her own children.)<br /><br />Here's a case of a father who fought for custody but mother preference prevailed. She murdered her son after abusing him:<br /><br />http://tinyurl.com/9rok6q<br />"Sekulski, 30, who allegedly admitted to repeatedly beating her son with a belt and stuffing him with junk food until his weight ballooned to 250 pounds, is accused of delivering the death blow to her child on Dec. 26, when she slammed his head into a wall. "<br /><br />And this case of a custodial mother's criminal neglect where a father now has custody:<br /><br />http://tinyurl.com/na5xl6<br />"MESA, AZ - Family members say two toddlers left home alone on Sunday in deplorable conditions are now happy, clean and safe.<br /><br />"When I grabbed him in my arms it was a big sigh of relief," said William Schiminski, the father of both boys, who now has custody.<br /><br />Their mother was arrested on child endangerment and neglect charges after police say she left the 2 and 3-year-old children in the home with little food, and “feces and urine stains all over the floor in the children’s bedroom.”<br />"We are grateful to the Mesa Police Department and CPS Case workers that responded to the scene on Sunday morning and protected our babies until our family could arrive to take them finally home," said Alishia Wenzell, the children's aunt.<br />[...]<br />The responding officer said after arriving into the house, the 2-year-old boy went directly to the pantry and began eating dog food."PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-84982331540653282752009-07-08T13:13:14.107-04:002009-07-08T13:13:14.107-04:00Last point Polish Knight.
Women are the only ones...Last point Polish Knight.<br /><br />Women are the only ones who get pregnant and bear children which is why the safe haven laws ONLY apply to them.<br /><br />Of course that should have been obvious to anyone of average intelligence. <br /><br />Next you'll be telling me men want to get prenatal care, vitamins and other things when their wives/girlfriends get pregnant.<br /><br />Oh, wait a minute you all have already done that by insisting all Federal programs be gender neutral including WIC...<br /><br />No common sense...NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-17188594857360891002009-07-08T12:30:01.120-04:002009-07-08T12:30:01.120-04:00As usual, Polish Knight, using the worse case scen...As usual, Polish Knight, using the worse case scenario to prove a point. AND there are plenty of bread-winning fathers in Africa...the West has no monopoly on that...NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-16910422029983606262009-07-08T12:27:51.460-04:002009-07-08T12:27:51.460-04:00Richard, your statistics are old...and many many m...Richard, your statistics are old...and many many mothers don't have their children but get Joint Legal instead...which as you should know, means nothing. So on paper it looks like everything is fine, the reality is quite different.<br /><br />PLUS you have not counted the many grandparents who have custody in that 85% number, many of them parental grandparents which means these mothers also rarely if ever see their children.<br /><br />AARP estimates it to be about 5 million, so a big problem for them is getting medical insurance for their members which includes their grandchildren since Medicare only covers seniors. <br /><br />It is not the small problem that you imply...but a growing one for women and children...being used for money.NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-67861956277793477242009-07-08T12:08:45.060-04:002009-07-08T12:08:45.060-04:00NY said: "I return to the central premise of ...NY said: "I return to the central premise of this blog to alert mothers to teh current situation where our court system is allowing men, who are little more then recreational sperm donors, to work the system and get custody of children from good, loving mothers...It's all an attempt to get either money or benefits from the state or the child's estate, mother, etc., and this must come to an end."<br /><br />I submit that women themselves could easily end it tomorrow.<br /><br />Simply stop producing babies for "recreational sperm donors."<br /><br />Insist on marriage instead.<br /><br />RichardAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-83376854824447240472009-07-08T11:49:37.127-04:002009-07-08T11:49:37.127-04:00PK said: "By your definition, if a few men a...PK said: "By your definition, if a few men are "allowed" to "game the system" as recreational sperm donors and get children and, gasp, _money_ from women, then it's "common greed"."<br /><br />And it really is a few. 85% of single mothers have their children with them the majority of the time. And the majority collect child support. <br /><br />Of the remaining 15%, fathers who have the kids most of the time, the vast majority have this arrangement with the consent of the mother. <br /><br />Of the remaining fathers, chances are that at least some, perhaps many, of them are in joint custody arrangements with the mother having a substantial amount of time with the kids although this is only a guess.<br /><br />And when we finally get down to the tiny group of fathers who have obtained sole custody through the courts, only about a third of them have any support order AT ALL. And the number of them who actually receive the payments ordered is smaller still.<br /><br />This "fungus" looks a lot more like a paper tiger to me.<br /><br />Richard.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-29646814229133401372009-07-08T11:46:59.052-04:002009-07-08T11:46:59.052-04:00NYMOM, I love how you imply that the men only want...NYMOM, I love how you imply that the men only want custody to get out of paying child-support while lauding mothers who demand it. I don't know whether you're referring to "recreational sperm donors" as men who father children via one night stands, but the law holds them responsible financially. It's hardly "recreational" if he's paying for parenthood.<br /><br />Yes, it sounds petty to argue over dollars and cents but the difference between a parent in the west whose children are well fed and clothed and the mothers and their children on late-night TV starving in Africa is clear: breadwinning fathers are useful to have around.<br /><br />You are attempting to sweep legal infant abandonment under the rug by proclaiming that few women use it. That doesn't change the fact that is an option that ALL mothers have that few men are able to take advantage of. You want a society where women have all rights and goodies and few responsibilities an the reverse for men and that men are "greedy" for actually thinking we deserve something better than that. <br /><br />It's no wonder, then, when so many women with this world-owes-me-a-living attitude wind up with bad boys and fakes who told them everything they wanted to hear. "Boo hoo! Life is so unfair! I didn't get everything and he got something! Waaah!"<br /><br />In the meantime, us men who have that one thing women never throw into a trash dumpster: money, have time to go into our 30's and pick and choose among women with sensible attitudes and thinking. We, and our wives and children, get to live in nice places while the welfare state collapses around us (check out California.) I am keeping my passport up-to-date in case that syndrome spreads to my area. It reminds me of Hurricain Katrina where all the two parent families left the area and the welfare recipients were covered with mosquitos on the rooftops. Single motherhood: Starving and suffering on a TV set near you!PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-13570240187577847182009-07-08T11:12:12.037-04:002009-07-08T11:12:12.037-04:00Unfortunately it's not just a few males 'g...Unfortunately it's not just a few males 'gaming' the system now but everyone and his grandmother has gotten into the act...<br /><br />You cannot compare the few mothers who abandon babies in safe havens to the numbers of men who fight for custody to get out of child support or get some other benefits attached to custody...<br /><br />It's growing like a fungus throughout our society...NYMOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05762350054432716749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-15213284696918494722009-07-08T10:14:11.915-04:002009-07-08T10:14:11.915-04:00NYMOM, you're applying a double standard. Her...NYMOM, you're applying a double standard. Here's what you say about the prupose of this blog:<br /><br />"I return to the central premise of this blog to alert mothers to teh current situation where our court system is allowing men, who are little more then recreational sperm donors, to work the system and get custody of children from good, loving mothers...It's all an attempt to get either money or benefits from the state or the child's estate, mother, etc., and this must come to an end.<br />It's about common greed."<br /><br />By your definition, if a few men are "allowed" to "game the system" as recreational sperm donors and get children and, gasp, _money_ from women, then it's "common greed".<br /><br />But on the other hand, when ALL women have access to "safe havens" to abandon their babies you argue that, hey, it's just a few women doing that so who cares. <br /><br />It's pretty obvious that if it was only or mostly MEN doing such a thing, you'd be going for the torches and pitchforks. You're just making a goodie grab for mothers. And hey, that's ok. I'm amused that you're doing so in a chivalrous society created by white males that empowers you to even consider doing so in the first place. <br /><br />You remind me of my wife's black cat, Marisia, who is sweet and nice and purrs when she wants food but the rest of the time, if you try to hold her, she hisses and bites and scratches you. I personally would have taken her to the pound but my wife thinks she's cute. <br /><br />Let's hope for your sake that chivalrous males continue to think such behavior is "cute."PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-43569912447562713442009-07-08T10:05:54.708-04:002009-07-08T10:05:54.708-04:00Richard claims: "I think NY is also mistakenl...Richard claims: "I think NY is also mistakenly analogizing these prides or herds with society in general. These are FAMILY groups. Of course a male will defend the females and young of his own family group."<br /><br />But, wait, Richard! It gets BETTER than that! Much of the time, these males don't protect their family groups but rather their TERRITORY or RIGHTS to the females. The females in a pride are expected to hunt, defend their young, and share the proceeds with the dominant male. (Much like aging career women who pay taxes for rich white male politicians to slush the money to his supporters...)<br /><br />The lion sits around on his butt most of the time and only wakes up when bachelor lions wander into the area or when a lionesse gets uppity. <br /><br />In theory, the lionesses (plural?) could gang up on the dominant male and tell him to eff off and choose their mates based upon their dishwashing skills and sensitivity, but they seem to like the arrangement of being dominated. Hmmmm.....PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8740475.post-52940714993673014632009-07-08T09:56:38.480-04:002009-07-08T09:56:38.480-04:00NYMOM claims: "Once again Polish Knight you h...NYMOM claims: "Once again Polish Knight you have confused chivalry with males of every species who treat females well in order to have sex..."<br /><br />NYMOM, have you ever left the United States? Traditionalist cultures either have "arranged marriages" or legalized prostitution. Er, I know this personally. I didn't have to be chivalrous to have sex with a legal prostitute anymore than you are chivalrous with the grocery store clerk to bag your food. Such women either provide a service or they do what they have to do as part of the culture. <br /><br />NYMOM claims: "Men did not create that behavior, God, nature or evolution (take your pick) did..."<br /><br />You probably also think that God and nature created McDonalds, Starbucks, Fish and Chips, and Blockbuster video. <br /><br />NYMOM says: "It looks like your knighthood is about to be revoked..."<br /><br />It's rather funny that you say that because the women in my life laugh that I remind them of the men in stories of 15th century Eastern Europe when Slavic knights clearly were NOT chivalrous as people today associate with the term. <br /><br />And they like it. They regard American and English men as wimps. If you want to learn a naughly slavic word to shock Russians and Poles in your area, call a wimp a "sookah". But be prepared for them to be shocked!PolishKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740194441387995674noreply@blogger.com